The Mentat Handbook
Above all else, the Mentat must be a generalist, not a
specialist. It is wise to have decisions of great moment
monitored by generalists. Experts and specialists lead you
quickly into chaos. They are a source of useless nit
picking, the ferocious quibble over a comma. The Mentat-
generalist, on the other hand, should bring to decision-
making a healthy common sense. He must not cut himself off
from the broad sweep of what is happening in this universe.
He must remain capable of saying: “There’s no real mystery
about this at the moment. This is what we want now. It may
prove wrong later, but we’ll correct that when we come to
it.” The Mentat-generalist must understand that anything
which we can identify as our universe is merely part of
larger phenomena. But the expert looks backward; he looks
into the narrow standards of his own specialty. The
generalist looks outward; he looks for living principles,
knowing full well that such principles change, that they
develop. It is to the characteristics of change itself that
the Mentat-generalist must look. There can be no permanent
catalogue of such change, no handbook or manual. You must
look at it with as few preconceptions as possible, asking
yourself: “Now what is this thing doing?”
-The Mentat Handbook
About this entry
You’re currently reading “The Mentat Handbook,” an entry on Paul D. Ouderkirk
- Published:
- 09.03.08 / 4pm
- Category:
- Collected Wisdom
2 Comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss [?] | trackback uri [?]